Product Code Database
Example Keywords: wi-fi -games $97-148
   » » Wiki: Florisbad Skull
Tag Wiki 'Florisbad Skull'.
Tag

The Florisbad Skull is an important human fossil of the early Middle Stone Age, representing either late Homo heidelbergensis or early . It was discovered in 1932 by T. F. Dreyer at the Florisbad site, Free State Province, .


Research history

Discovery
In 1835, early discovered a by the Haagenstad saltpan, which was settled by Hendrik Venter. After his death, his grandson Floris commercialised the site, and became a regionally famous bath. In 1912, during excavations into an adjacent hillock to expand the bath, workers discovered animal fossils and . English professor Geo Potts and South African palaeontologist were sent by the National Museum, Bloemfontein, to investigate. They were able to study the material collected by Venter's wife, Martha Johanna Venter, and Broom suggested further excavation might yield human fossils. In 1917, South African zoologist Thomas Frederik Dreyer made a collection of fossil animal teeth recovered from the bath gravel. He returned in 1926 with Captain Robert Egerton Helme where they discovered molars, and in 1928 with A. Lyle where they recovered several more fossils and stone tools. In 1932, Dreyer investigated spring vent deposits, where he discovered a partial human skull alongside more fossil animals and stone tools.

The Florisbad skull was the first human fossil found in Africa directly associated with either stone tools or extinct animals. Dreyer and Dutch neurologist Cornelius Ubbo Ariëns Kappers described the skull in 1935.


Classification
In 1935, Dreyer speculatively reconstructed the complete Florisbad Skull, and claimed that it belonged to an extremely lowly race, going so far as to classify it as a new species and as Homo (Africanthropus) helmei — naming it after Captain Helme. Kappers, on the other hand, drew parallels between the of the Florisbad Skull and " H. sapiens fossilis" (), and preferred to consider it a type of modern human.

Dreyer lent the skull to South African anthropologist Matthew Robertson Drennan for study, who published a paper soon after. Drennan believed that, while the face resembled the Zambian Kabwe 1 (the "Rhodesian Man", classified as a primitive stock of modern human), the braincase better aligned with . He was also influenced by the opinion of South African archaeologist Astley John Hilary Goodwin, who identified a -like culture at the site and around South Africa — a culture which is associated with European Neanderthals. Drennan opted to classify the Florisbad Skull as " H. florisbadensis (helmei)", characterising it as an ancient African Neanderthal variant. In 1936, Dreyer published a correction after comparing the Florisbad braincase with that of a modern South Africa bushman, and reconsidered it as an early representative of the Bushman Race. Nonetheless, in 1937, Drennan reaffirmed that the Florisbad Skull measurements, "cry out for a Neanderthal interpretation."

That same year, Scottish anatomist Alexander Galloway criticised Drennan's focus on skull measurements over anatomical landmarks. He instead compared the Florisbad Skull to the "ferocious appearance" of the male Aboriginal Australian skull, as well as the South African Middle Pleistocene (at the time considered to be an ancestor of South African bushmen), remarking that, "there are so many features which are common to all three that two-thirds of the Florisbad features are encountered in the modern Australian skull and two-thirds in the Boskop." He considered the Florisbad Skull a proto-Australian, along with specimens such as Rhodesian Man and the Javan . He also raised the possibility that it was an ancestor of the Javan , which British anatomist had earlier characterised, "as an offshoot from the stem which afterwards diverged into Australian and Negro types." In 1958, South African palaeontologist Ronald Singer compared the Florisbad Skull with the recently discovered South African , and similarly grouped them with the Rhodesian Man as ancestors of modern bushmen.

In 1978, American biological anthropologist G. Phillip Rightmire made his own reconstruction of the Florisbad Skull without speculating on the dimensions of missing pieces, and found that it is substantially distinct from any living population. He did not believe the Florisbad Skull, or any other "archaic H. sapiens", were ancestral to one specific population. He classified it as part of the same stock as Kabwe 1 (at this point, H. sapiens rhodesiensis) and possibly the Ethiopian .

Clarke (1985) compared it to Laetoli Hominid 18 and , which are now considered early anatomically modern human ( H. sapiens) fossils. The difficulty of placing the fossil in either H. heidelbergensis or H. sapiens prompted McBrearty and Brooks (2000) to revive the designation H. helmei. In 2016 argued that the Florisbad Skull, along with the and specimens, belong to an archaic or "early" form of Homo sapiens. The Florisbad Skull was also classified as Homo sapiens by Hublin et al. (in 2017), in part on the basis of the similar Jebel Irhoud finds from Morocco. Scerri et al. (2018) adduce the fossil as evidence for "African multiregionalism", the view of a complex speciation of H. sapiens widely dispersed across Africa, with substantial hybridization between H. sapiens and more divergent hominins in different regions."Other early H. sapiens fossils from Florisbad in South Africa (~260 ka), Omo Kibish (~195 ka) and Herto (~160 ka), both in Ethiopia, are morphologically diverse. This diversity has led some researchers to propose that fossils such as Jebel Irhoud and Florisbad actually represent a more primitive species called 'H. helmei', using the binomen given to the Florisbad partial cranium in 1935. ...However, we view H. sapiens as an evolving lineage with deep African roots, and therefore prefer to recognize such fossils as part of the diversity shown by early members of the H. sapiens clade." Lahr and Mounier (2019) also classify the Florisbad Skull as an example of early H. sapiens, which they suggest arose between 350,000 and 260,000 years ago from the merging of populations in East and South Africa.


Description
The Florisbad Skull belonged to a specimen within the size range of modern humans, with a brain volume larger than modern averages, at 1,440 cm3. The skull was also found with Middle Stone Age tools.

The fossil skull is a fragment; preserved are the right side of the face, most of the frontal bone, and some of the maxilla, along with portions of the roof and sidewalls. A single, upper right, third molar was also found with the adult skull.

The skull also showed extensive porotic hyperostosis as well as a large number of healed lesions, including pathological drainage or vascular tracts. There are also a couple of large puncture marks and scratch-like marks which may reflect hyena chewing.

Based on enamel samples from the tooth found with the skull, the fossil has been directly dated by electron spin resonance dating to around between (between 294,000 and 224,000 years old)..


Context
The partial cranium is part of an assemblage of mostly carnivore prey remains, caught in vertical spring vents. It shows damage by hyena chewing. The spring vents were later sealed by deposits. "Peat II" is a deposit of dark organic clay representing a Middle Stone Age land surface, showing a human occupation horizon dated .

The wider Florisbad site has also produced a large and diverse fauna. The assemblage including micro-vertebrates from , rabbits, rodents and reptiles has informed researchers on the paleoenvironment of the interior of South Africa in the Middle Pleistocene. The large mammal component of the site suggests an open grassland with a body of water in the immediate vicinity. Although many specimens are dated by comparisons of faunal assemblages, this method does not prove to have accurate chronological resolution for much of the last million years.


See also
  • List of human evolution fossils
  • Middle Stone Age


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time